Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rationale for the War on Terrorism
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. An unneeded content fork of material covered elsewhere. Did not redirect as this is a fairly implausible search term. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:48, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Rationale for the War on Terrorism (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article seems to have no purpose whatsoever. All of this is covered in War on Terror and the article is a mess. JokerXtreme (talk) 09:19, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- In that case, speedy redirect to War on Terror. Erpert (let's talk about it) 10:07, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete Doesn't seem appropriate as an article in its own right. Not at all. SmokingNewton (talk) 15:32, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:29, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:29, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Wikireader41 (talk) 03:00, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Unintentional WP:CFORK. Compare with War on Terror#US objectives. — Rankiri (talk) 11:50, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep states the facts on a historic event, which should be in an encyclopedia. Does not appear to take sides or say what the author's rationale is. Dew Kane (talk) 04:28, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- This is already covered in the main article. This article offers nothing new. --JokerXtreme (talk) 09:59, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.